TAKO. INTERNET SEIT 1996.
Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] 200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4

Subject: Re: [OM] 200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4
From: GPaul64@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 21:44:56 EDT
In a message dated 4/22/99 10:30:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time, WKato@xxxxxxx 
writes:

<< I am quite ill; I can't part with anything at all but I may be forced to 
for 
 space reasons. Anyway, does anyone have any experience with the Tamron 
 180/2.5 as compared to Zuikos in the 180-200 range? As I recall it did well 
 in Modern Photo tests.
 
 Warren Kato >>

Warren,

I may be even sicker.   I've got all of the above, including the 200 f/4, the 
85-250, *and* the 180 Tamron.  

I haven't recently tested the Tamron vs the 85-250, but I recall it edged out 
my 50-250, slightly, in resolution.  Contrast was more noticeably better.   
Tested at about f/11, as per my usual.   One more thing - the 180 Tamron 
works very well with the Zuiko 1.4.  

Regards,

Greg L

http://www.gplphotography.com



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>