Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ADITL--who's who?

Subject: Re: [OM] ADITL--who's who?
From: "John Petrush" <petrush@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 20:57:24 -0400
Acer Victoria wrote:
>So, are we ever going to find out who took which photo?

... and ...

Charlie L. wondered:
>And when is the next one?

... and ...

John Lind thought great thoughts:
>I was thinking about proposing the Equinox in late September for ADITL II
>(it was not referred to as the Autumnal as it will be the Vernal "Down
Under").
>....
>However, I think George Anderson needs to weigh in on whether he wants to
>sponsor a second one on his site along with all the scanning volunteers.

... and ...

I wondered what the theme or topic ought to be.  A couple ideas came to
mind:
a)  "normal" lens images  (this would include 35-80 mm range, not
exclusively 50's.  I could even be talked into the 85mm f/2 as a viable
lens.  Would include all the zooms that cover this range too.)
b)  People at work or play - any age, any activity.  Just has to be a people
shot.
c)  Scenic views - landscape, seascape, rivers, streams...you get the idea.

I'm sure there's lots more, these are simply seeds to spark some discussion
(hehehehe, as if we ever needed to fuel *that* fire <g>).  I do believe a
consistent theme is interesting.  It gives many different ways of seeing the
same basic idea through many eyes.

As for who shot what, my compliments to all who went through the time and
effort to make an image and submit it.  It takes no small amount of courage
to allow yourself to be vulnerable, even in friendly surroundings.  I claim
ADITL_5 as my own.  I was pleased to get the shot - some days ya just get
lucky - and pleased to share it with this illustrious group.  I do wish we
could agree to add photo credits to our images.  I for one would welcome and
appreciate feedback in the form of positive and constructive criticism (I
wince at bashings).  But, as always, I will support the group's consensus
and do my best to support ADITL II with my photos and scanning services to
anyone who needs them.

George?  You ready to take on another round?

John P
______________________________________
there is no "never" - just long periods of "not yet".
there is no "always" - just long periods of "so far".




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz