All right Tom, Gary, Giles etc, here's my list assuming top performance:
16/3.5 fisheye
18/3.5 (optional)
21/2 or 21/3.5
24/2 or 24/2.8 (optional)
28/2
35-80/2.8 (forget all the others)
50/1.2
50/2 macro
50-250/5 or 65-200/4 or 85-250/5 or the Tamron
80/4 1:1 macro (optional - requires bellows or auto tube)
90/2 macro
135/4.5 macro (optional - requires 65-116 auto tube)
180/2 + 1.4x
250/2 or 350/2.8 or 300/4.5 or Novoflex
600/6.5 or 1000/11 (both optional)
george
Gary Reese wrote:
>
> Tom S. wrote:
>
> << I'd be very interested in the opinions of this group on what a
> 'complete setup' of lenses would be. I realize everyone's situation is
> quite . . . >>
>
> 18mm f/3.5 Zuiko
> 21mm f/3.5 Zuiko
> 24mm f/2.8 Zuiko
> 28mm f/2 Zuiko
> 35-70mm f/3.6 Zuiko
> 35-70mm f/3.5~4.5 S Zuiko
> 35-105mm f/3.5~4.5 Zuiko
> 50mm f/1.4 Zuiko (>1,000,000 serial number)
> 50mm f/2 Macro Zuiko
> 65-200mm f/4 Zuiko
> 80-200mm f/2.8 Tamron SP
> 80mm Macro 1:1 Zuiko
> 90mm f/2 Macro Zuiko
> 135mm f/4.5 Macro Zuiko
> 250mm f/2 Zuiko w/ 1.4X teleconverter
> 400mm f/5.6 Novoflex
>
> for landscapes, children's sports, theater, nature.
>
> Gary Reese
> Las Vegas, NV
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|