Hello Tom
I have both the F3.5-4.5 and the F3.6 versions of this lens. I haven't done
any real tests of those, but I feel that the F3.5-4.5 is a very fine
performer and incredibly compact.
I just got the Modern Photography (Jan. 1980) with the test of the F3.6 and
as I already have the test of the F3.5-4.5 (June 1986), I can compare them.
The F3.6 might have a slightly better resolution and contrast in the
center, but the F3.5-4.5 seems to have better contrast values in the
corners.
Modern's verdict: "The unusually sharp, compact and light-weight twin-ring
zoom will fit most ever-ready lens cases. Considering its high quality and
compact dimensions, the lens is a good choice for Olympus users seeking a
"normal zoom" of moderate aperture".
So if you can find one at a reasonable price, go ahead.
Lars
----------
> Fra: Tom Scales <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Til: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Emne: [OM] Info on the 35-70 f/3.5-4.5
> Dato: 25. marts 2000 02:49
>
> I am curious about this lens. I've read Paul Farrar's page and the SIF
page,
> but it doesn't give me actual experience. Gary's page is helpful, but...
>
> I dropped in a local camera store today and they have a mint one for very
> little money, so I picked it up. It's very light weight, only 190gm
> compared to 380 for the f/4, exactly half as heavy. I find the 35-70
range
> very useful and think this is a nice lens, but would love to hear other's
> experiences.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tom
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|