In a message dated 2/21/01 1:44:31 PM Pacific Standard Time,
pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< In support of McBroom, though, one has to remember those are dealer
asking prices and I'm recording actual selling prices. Which would you
rather have?
>>
McBroom or his publishers haven't responded directly to the errors about the
OM 3 and the 350mm f2.5.
The publisher said they would "pass it along".
McBrooms is outdated, inaccurate information.
This is 2001 and a new system is needed.
Gary gets my vote as "the chosen one".
Gary's lens test and knowledge are incredibly priceless.
McBroom or his publisher's should get real and find somone who is accurate and
in touch with the times.
John R
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|