Yes, our OM is the poorest one among the others, just have a glance on
the other manufacturers lenses:
Canon - 28/1.8 AF - 3.2
Nikon - 28/2 MF - 3.9
Minolta - 28/2 AF - 4.1
Pentax - 24/2 AF - 3.7 (no 28/2 lens)
C.H.Ling
Winsor Crosby wrote:
>
>
> That is interesting. They give the same rating, 2.6, to the 28/2,
> which is as good as anyone's good lens, and the 200/4! Their rating
> does seem to be somewhat divorced from reality.
>
> Winsor
> --
> Winsor Crosby
> Long Beach, California, USA
> mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|