Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:09:12 -0400
The 4T bottom is so light compared to brass that it feels about as light as
a plastic OM-g bottom.

John  Hermanson
___________________________________
http://www.zuiko.com
Camtech, Olympus Service since 1977.
21 South Lane,  Huntington NY 11743-4714
Phone/fax 631-424-2121
Free Olympus Manuals: 1-800-221-3000
___________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Gomez" <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:42 AM
Subject: [OM] OM-4 vs. OM-4T


| From a recent discussion, I ended up wondering about this:
|
| What are the differences between the OM-4 and the OM-4T(i)?
|
| I know of only 3:
|
| 1) The OM-4T(i) cameras weigh a whopping 2oz. less than the OM-4, as a
| result of the use of titanium in some of the body construction.
|
| 2) The OM-4T(i)s have newer circuitry that has less battery drain.
|
| 3) The OM-4T(i)s can sync at any shutter speed using the F-280 flash.
|
| Are there other differences? Other than the flash sync speed, which is
| something I've never yet needed, I can't think of any other true
| *functional* difference.
|
| ---
| Scott Gomez
|



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz