I could not have said this better. Exactly my feeling about them all.
Tom
From: "Joel Wilcox" <jdubikins@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> If the 90/2 and 100/2 are more or less of comparable quality and
sharpness,
> the 85/2 is very good but would not be quite as good as the 100/2.
>
> The 85/2 is about the same size as the 100/2.8. It is really a pleasure to
> use because of its size. (It feels more like it fits into the Zuiko 2.8
> stable.) But if I had to have one lens among the 85/2, 90/2, and 100/x.x,
it
> would be the 90/2.
>
> Joel W.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|