Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Looking at digital

Subject: Re: [OM] Looking at digital
From: "Norman S. Nadel" <nsnadel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 05:48:26 -0800
Clemente:

TCON-14B  =  tele lens

WCON-08B  = wide

I did a fair amount of research before buying the above. Both were
considered as having better glass than the Sony.

No idea of which Oly cameras they fit.  The WCON does say CAMEDIA on its
edge.

Norm
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clemente Colayco" <litefoot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Looking at digital


> What is the type no of the olympus wide and tele converter you use on teh
> Sony 707? Is it the one used on the IS 3?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Norman S. Nadel" <nsnadel@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 7:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [OM] Looking at digital
>
>
> > Wayne:
> >
> > I have the both Coolpix 990 and 4500. I also have the Sony DSC-707.
> >
> > The standard autofocus of both the Coolpix units is OK .. nothing to
have
> an
> > orgasm over. On the other hand, the Coolpix macro capability with
> autofocus
> > is spectacular. I use the Coolpix mainly for macro work (probably the
best
> > digital macro units around).  They are also great for photo-microscopy.
> >
> > If you are really interested in an awesome autofocus unit with a great
> lens
> > take a look at the Sony DSC-707 or its replacement, the 717.  Truly
> amazing
> > .. even in total darkness!
> > I have both wide angle and telephoto accessory lenses for the 707 ..
both
> > are Olympus.
> >
> > Norm
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Wayne Culberson" <waynecul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 1:30 PM
> > Subject: [OM] Looking at digital
> >
> >
> > > I was at a camera store this afternoon where I could look at some of
the
> > > current digital offerings. The salesman was leaning toward the N*kon
> > Coolp*x
> > > 4500, but the one that got my attention was the Olympus C5050. Does
> anyone
> > > here have one of these, or have experience with one, that could give a
> few
> > > coments good or bad?
> > > Wayne
> > >
> > >
> > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
> >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz