Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Ideal lens for photographing inside a church?

Subject: Re: [OM] Ideal lens for photographing inside a church?
From: Jim Brokaw <jbrokaw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 18:11:29 -0800
on 2/8/03 12:02 PM, derek fong at olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I plan to take pictures of my niece's baptism in a few weeks and am
> using that as an excuse to get another Zuiko.  I currently have a
> 28/2.8 and a 50/1.8, but am considering a zoom lens (maybe a
> 35-105/3.5-4.5) because I have no idea how close or how far I will be
> from the "action".  I'd obviously like to be able to get some practical
> use out of the lens after the baptism, and since I don't currently have
> a telephoto lens, I figured a zoom lens was the best way to go (in
> terms of having a good, everyday lens mounted to my OM-2 most of the
> time).  Still, I'm not sure how the lighting will be in this particular
> situation, so I'm a little hesitant about the zoom lens because of some
> of the previous posts I've read about the viewfinder being too dark for
> focusing.  I'm also considering a 35-70/3.5-4.5, although I fear that I
> might not like the shorter zoom range.  Still, it's cheaper and smaller
> than the 35-105.
> 
> Can anyone offer some suggestions?  I'm not completely opposed to just
> getting another prime lens, but like I said, I'd prefer to take the
> opportunity to get a good all-purpose lens, which might mean a zoom
> lens of some sort.
> 
> -f
> 
> 
> -- 
> Derek Fong
> Web Application Developer
> subtitle designs inc. <http://www.subtitled.com/>


Derek -- if you want a zoom and the range isn't too short, you could
consider the 35-70/3.6. This is probably sharper than the lenses you
mention, although not greatly so. Faster at the long end than the
35-70/3/5-4.5 although much bigger and heavier. Smaller and lighter (both
ways...) than the 35-105/3.5-4.5 and probably about the same cost or a bit
less expensive.

For a long lens thats faster for less money how about the 100/2.8 or the
135/2.8? Either of those will be sharp and probably less money than a
35-105/3.5-4.5. Then you could get a 85/2.0 for probably a bit more than the
35-105/3.5-4.5, or a 100/2.0 for a lot more... or just get them all <g>, not
a bad choice in the bunch. You really do need them all eventually...
-- 

Jim Brokaw
OM-'s of all sorts, and no OM-oney... 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz