Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Backpack vs shoulder bag. Was: Tamron 80-200 storage/carry so

Subject: Re: [OM] Backpack vs shoulder bag. Was: Tamron 80-200 storage/carry solutions - Timbuk2?
From: Chris Barker <imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:43:43 +0000
The Billingham Photo Packington is a bit like a mixture of the 2; it
is a shoulder bag which can take a backpack harness.  But it also has
an anti-theft strap to go around the wearer's waist which can take a
fair amount of weight.  If my back is aching, I use this strap to
relieve the strain.  One disadvantage might be its size: it is quite
deep and could carry 2/3 bodies and 4/5 lenses inside.  It also has
front and end pockets and a zipped document pocket.

I receive no commission from Billingham, but I do like their kit ;-)

Chris

At 11:08 +0100 19/02/03, Bernard Frangoulis wrote:
Regarding bags, there are apparently 2 categories of photographers:
the backpack type, and the shoulder bag type.

Personally, when travelling, I cannot imagine having my lenses in a
backpack. Say you are visiting a town, a market, etc., photographing
people and the town itself - with a backpack, for each photo, I
would have to remove the backpack, put it on the ground, get the
camera, change the lens if necessary... With a shoulder bag, I have
everything readily accessible (including the camera - I don't like
carrying it around my neck, I prefer to keep it in the bag, with a
short strap to grab it). Sure, carrying a shoulder bag can be a pain
in the a**, but the advantages are determinant for me. Under other
circumstances, for instance photographing landscape only, I can
imagine the backpack is OK.

In addition, I don't want the shoulder bag to be a rigid "case" with
everything neatly packaged (I finf LowePro and Tamrac bags to be too
rigid). I need a bag that keeps close to my body, with the camera
and lenses easily accessible at all time. The only bags I have found
to fit this description are Domke bags. I have an F-3X and an F-2 -
and all would be perfect except that I now find the F-3X a little
bit too small, and the F-2 a little bit too large (too long
actually). So I am still in the never ending search for the perfect
bag... Perhaps the F-4AF would be OK?.....

Bernard


--
<|_:-)_|>

C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
?
+44 (0)7092 251126
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz