Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Zuiko 35~105/3.5-4.5

Subject: [OM] Re: Zuiko 35~105/3.5-4.5
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:21:03 -0500
This comes late and is redundant, but the rear element of #119*** 
appears to be flat too.

For what it's worth, my walkabout kit consists of these goodies, 
all of which fit in a fanny pack ("bum bag" for some of  you.  Do 
I need to keep translating for those whose native tongue is not 
Murkin?):

50/3.5 Zuiko Macro
Set of Oly auto extension tubes (I just attach all three together, 
with a body cap on one end and a rear cap on the other). 
19-35/3.5~4.5 Phoenix
35-105/3.5~4.5 Zuiko
180/2.8 Zuiko
1.4X-A tele extender

The 180/2.8 is what I've replaced the 65-200 with.  I first went 
with the 80-200/2.8 Tamron.  It's a fantastic lens, but it's just 
too big and heavy for a really lazy man's light kit.  I've found 
that the 180, which is barely bigger, and no heavier, than the 
deposed 65-200, is exactly right for 90 percent of the times when 
the 35-105 is too short.  And the tele extender, which wouldn't 
work on the 65-200, gives me a poor man's 250/4.

Walt
 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A human being has a natural desire to have more of a good thing 
than he needs. -- Mark Twain (defining the cause of Zuikoholism a 
century ago)



---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Date:  Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:15:25 -0000

>
>I can go halfway!
>
>151xxx has a rear element which is as near flat as I can 
>determine. 
>
>Piers 
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf
>Of Roger D. Key
>Sent: 18 February 2004 10:31
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [OM] Re: Zuiko 35~105/3.5-4.5
>
>
>
>>There must have been some optical changes, as I believe that one 
>>can see a difference in the rear element. As far as I recall, 
>>the older lens has an externally flat  rear element, whilst the 
>>newer model has a convex element.
>>Can anyone confirm that?
>
>Roger Key
>
 


 
                   

The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz