Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Tripod mount for Tamron (was "Tokina AT-X 50-250 vs. OM 85-250"

Subject: [OM] Re: Tripod mount for Tamron (was "Tokina AT-X 50-250 vs. OM 85-250")
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:32:14 -0700
You are right Walt, but there is are 2 particular reasons why the Tamron 
mount is so prone to breakage.

First, it is not as robustly made as many mounts. Most designs simply 
can't be broken by over tightening the screw.

Second, it is not adequately rigid under fairly normal strain in use. 
There is flex in the mount itself due to bending of the metal. If this 
is not understood, it is easy to feel the movement with your hands, 
assume it is looseness and try tightening the screw further - leading to 
breakage.

Not everyone is as loose as Walt. I guess I'm not either, but at least I 
investigated the movement I felt when using it in the field on a monopod 
and didn't break it either.

Moose

joel-wilcox@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

>Mine busted, that's why I trashed it. :(
>
>One of the things in the back of my mind is that there are a fair number
>of these lenses available but many without tripod mounts (probably
>because they broke for the reasons you mentioned).  I like to get the
>word out that if someone can find one he doesn't need to worry that it
>lacks the stock mount, which also is not available from Tamron IIRC.
>
Correct. It is not available and Keck Ind. hasn't made their aftermarket 
one for some time either.

>>I think way too many folks tighten down their tripod mounts 
>>way too much, and that sort of foolishness can break the 
>>Tamron mount.
>>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz