Bill,
I certainly was not directing that toward you, I was just making a general
statement. My point was that I don't care how anyone prefers to shoot or shoot
then convert their images, whatever. It's a personal decision, and the reasons
to do it or not to do it (go digital) are many and varied, not solely based on
perceived cost, ease, technology, etc. etc. but also on just personal
feelings on what photography means to each of us.
George
NSURIT@xxxxxxx writes:
> Hmmm, stirred up a little fire. No, my e-1 is not better than your OM 2S,
>
> however my OM 2S with Morgan Sparks leathers might . . .
>
> Bottom line for each of us is that they are all just tools used to capture
> images. I've seen some work done with a disposable that is beautiful and
> some
> done with Hasselblads, I wouldn't give you 2 cents for. I have a friend
> who
> uses a Canon G5 and she consistently produces stunning images. So I guess
> it is really the "eye" behind the camera that makes the difference. Bill
> Barber
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|