BILL CLARK wrote:
>in general yes, which is why with digital I always shoot about 1 stop
>under....you can then bring back whatever you want in your imaging
>editor...you can get perfectly exposed shots this way. If you blow out your
>hilights there is no gettign them back in digital, so better to underexpose a
>bit.
>
Not always true. RAW format on many cameras gives extra leeway on the
overexposure end compared to JPEGs. In the case of the 300D I have,
there is about 1 stop of highlight data that can be retrieved from a RAW
file but isn't in a comparable JPEG. I understand this is true to more
or less degree for most DSLRs.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|