Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Canon EOS 300D (OT, in case it wasn't obvious!)

Subject: [OM] Re: Canon EOS 300D (OT, in case it wasn't obvious!)
From: Steve Schaffner <sfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:12:50 -0500 (EST)
The way I prefer to think of it, my manual focusing is always perfect.
It's just that some of the time it's perfect for picture that I'm not
taking.

Steve

On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, IanG wrote:

> 
> I can still focus manually, I just don't get it right :-)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Andrew Fildes
> Sent: 08 January 2005 09:01
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: Canon EOS 300D (OT, in case it wasn't obvious!)
> 
> 
> I'll just bet that your eyes aren't 50 years old yet!
> I DO want to focus perfectly, manually. It's just not always possible.
> AndrewF
> 
> 
> On 07/01/2005, at 7:29 PM, Simon Worby wrote:
> 
> > But what if you actually *want* to focus manually? Surely people on 
> > this
> > list will understand when I say I actively enjoy focussing manually, 
> > and
> > when I get the images back which are razor-sharp when projected to 6' x
> > 4', and I can say proudly "I focussed that perfectly"?
> >
> > Like double-declutching on a car with no synchromesh. A perfect
> > gearchange gives you a really warm glow all-over!


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz