Me ... a pair of 1.4s.
Gary
At 01:58 PM 3/21/2005, you wrote:
>Does anyone on the list who's interested in this venture NOT own a Zuiko
>50/1.8?
>
>Conceptually, my vote would be to have the camera and lens be the same, just
>the locations be different. Which would mean shipping the whole kit.
>
>However, if everyone had a 50/1/8 available, we could do the OM-1, and
>50/1.8 lens without incurring the postage penalty of shipping both lens and
>body. And there's something attractive to me about the idea of seeing all
>those photos with different iterations of the same lens.
>
>Otherwise, the Trip 35 sounds peachy to me.
>
>And I too am happy to do whatever pleases everyone. I think it's a great
>idea no matter how it is accomplished.
>
>
>Rob in Seattle
>
>
>On 2005.03.18 1:59 PM, "Simon Worby" <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Surely the answer has to be a lens-less OM-1?
>
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|