Hey, thanks John.
Joel W.
On 1/18/06, John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Boy Joel, those are gorgeous shots. Hats off!
> ___________________________________
> John Hermanson
> Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
> 21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743
> 631-424-2121 | Olympus OM Service since 1977
> www.zuiko.com | omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Remove 'spam' when writing
>
> Joel Wilcox wrote:
> > I agree with Jeff in principle, but here are some examples of shots at f22:
> >
> > http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jfwilcox/up/upbond6.jpg
> > and I think also these:
> > http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jfwilcox/up/upbond2.jpg
> > http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jfwilcox/up/upbond3.jpg
> >
> > I used that stop because I wanted a slower shutter speed, but I
> > wouldn't be afraid to use the stop in the future. However, I
> > naturally tend towards f8 or f11 in landscape and only go to f16 or
> > f22 when I need the telephoto end of a lens like the 14-54 or a slower
> > speed.
> >
> > Joel W.
> >
> > On 1/16/06, Jeff Keller <jrk_om@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>Almost never would you want to use f22! The shorter focal length lenses of
> >>the E-system are diffraction limited at relatively small f numbers. You'll
> >>probably find that f5.6 to f8 work well. If there isn't something in the
> >>near foreground of a landscape, you'll have plenty of DOF.
> >>-jeff
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
