Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: [OT] A tip for Canyon flash shooters

Subject: [OM] Re: [OT] A tip for Canyon flash shooters
From: ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:40:50 -0500
Chuck, I must be missing your point; are you saying you think you can
get the 540EZ to work correctly and predictably with your 5D?

Thanks/ScottGee1

On 12/3/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The DJ at a recent bar mitzvah finally defeated me and the Canyon 5D and
> my 2.8 lenses.  He turned the lights down so low I could hardly see
> where to point the camera let alone count on me or the camera to arrive
> at a good focus.
>
> I hated to admit that I needed to abandon my beloved Sunpaks and T-32's
> (for event work at least) and move on to a Canyon flash unit with
> built-in autofocus assist light.  But that's a problem since the current
> cat's meow Canyon flash (the 580EX) is $380 at B&H (before a piddling
> $15 rebate).  If you're shooting an E-thing you also understand the
> problem since an FL-50 is no bargain either at $375.  It was also irking
> me that I would be paying for all that automation which I never use
> since I only shoot flash in manual mode.
>
> It finally struck me that there is a bargain to be had that solves my
> problem.  It's the Canyon 540EZ.  The EZ series flashes are off-the-film
> TTL flashes like the Oly T-series but new enough for autofocus.  From an
> automation standpoint they're film only.  They don't work anymore on
> digital gear since the Canyon digital cameras don't use OTF TTL exposure
> control.  But the 540EZ is just as powerful as a 580EX (about the same
> as a T-32), has a 7 stop manual control range, lighted control panel and
> an autofocus assist light that's good to 15 meters... 50% further than
> the 10 meter range of the much newer 580EX.  Better yet, I managed to
> snag one on the bay for $52 when they typically sell for $80-120.
>
> Tried it last night in the pitch black attic.  I prefocused the camera a
> few feet away to force it out of focus and then aimed at the far wall
> which was over 20 feet away.  It was so dark I wasn't sure what I was
> aiming at until the camera took the shot.  It turned out to be well
> focused, and by lucky guess work even reasonably well exposed on the
> first try.
>
> So, you too may be able to see in the dark.  Finally.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz