I have a silvernose in the 4XX.XXX series and a new one (+1.1) but do
not see any difference, both crisp and clear, the old one might be a
bit more yellow, that's all.
Iwert
>
> Since I don't have a proper loupe, I have a habit of using a fast 50
> for a loupe (makes a pretty
> good one). For some reason, the OLD silvernose 50/1.4 makes a
> brilliant, crisp loupe which is
> a pleasure to use, whereas the new (optically better) 50/1.4
> absolutely sucks: It appears to render
> an image of completely the wrong dioptre, it's like putting on the
> wrong glasses: Everything is blurred
> and it strains the eyes.
>
> Can anybody explain this phenomenon? Has anybody seen it before? I re-
> iterate the my new 50 is optically
> visibly superior to the old 50 in terms of the images it renders on
> film, so there is nothing wrong with
> the lens.
>
> Off-topic, I know... But has anybody seen this?
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|