Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] What about the overall image? [was first one with the 300mm f/4

Subject: Re: [OM] What about the overall image? [was first one with the 300mm f/4, 5]
From: Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:51:38 -0300
No, vibration? this lens' diaphragm makes almost no sound compared to my 
other Zuiko.
There was a bean bag over the body-lens, and MLU and diaphragm pre-fire.
I should have a better tripod, sure.

The slide was put as it should into the scanner.

The Nikon may have a focus issue, that's my worst nightmare. But take a 
look at the second upload ...

Well, at last: it _is_ a neat picture, despite the big front trunk.
In fact, this very issue makes it a somehow unusual picture - at least 
for the ones I make.

Curves are difficult for me. Are them difficult for anyone here?

I vote for curves !! :-)

Fernando.

Ken Norton wrote:
>> Second, the primary subject is soft. Whether from inexact focus,
>> vibration, aperture, scan or some combination, once the excessive
>> brightness is corrected, it's just not sharp. Looking at my version now
>> full size, I see I oversharpened it, although I may still prefer it to
>> the original softness.
>>
>>     
>
> I vote for vibration. But the scan my have a focus issue--it kinda looks
> like the slide was put in upside down.
>
> A neat picture, though.
>
> AG
>   


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz