ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!

from Ken Norton

Subject:	Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:48:13 -0600

>
> Good thing I didn't buy either one. Guess I kept all my OM lenses in vain?


Not if you also kept one of those nifty OM bodies to mount the OM lenses.

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Chuck is back, was: Chuck will be gone for a week, Mike Lazzari Re: [OM] Chuck is back, was: Chuck will be gone for a week, Charles Geilfuss Re: [OM] Chuck is back, was: Chuck will be gone for a week, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Chuck is back, was: Chuck will be gone for a week, siddiq@xxxxxxx [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Ken Norton

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 4/2/2010: maternal instincts, Moose
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Wanted: Light DZ telephoto zoom, Moose
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Oh, darn!!!!, Sue Pearce
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]