ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Is Moosie in WUV?

Subject:	Re: [OM] Is Moosie in WUV?
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:05:17 -0500

> Oly won't have a chance until they meet this size, let's say around 142 x
> 108 x 75 mm ;-)

And don't forget the grip shape. Olympus won't be considered a
"serious" contender until...

Let's not go there.  OK?

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] OM Fast Wides, WA in general, Nicholas Herndon Re: [OM] OM Fast Wides, WA in general, Ken Norton Re: [OM] OM Fast Wides, WA in general, Bill Pearce [OM] Is Moosie in WUV?, Moose Re: [OM] Is Moosie in WUV?, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Is Moosie in WUV?, Ken Norton Message not available Re: [OM] Is Moosie in WUV?, Stephen Troy Re: [OM] Is Moosie in WUV?, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Is Moosie in WUV?, Frank Wijsmuller Re: [OM] Is Moosie in WUV?, Ken Norton <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Is Moosie in WUV?, Frank Wijsmuller
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Odd behavior E-30, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Is Moosie in WUV?, Frank Wijsmuller
Next by Thread:	[OM] ( OM ) Photographing nature - my challenge, Brian Swale
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]