Yes, that makes sense, Jim. They have to make the conversion with minimum
design changes: less cost of re-design, much less cost and hassle from
re-submitting for airworthiness certification.
Chris
On 19 Nov 2011, at 07:53, Jim Nichols wrote:
> I have never run the numbers on weight and balance calculations, but, in
> many cases, I think it comes about in converting piston engine designs to
> turboprops. The turbos are so much lighter than the piston engines that
> they have to be moved forward as far as possible. The extended nose gives
> baggage space to help complete the balance with a full load of passengers.
> At least, that is my simple view of the issue.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|