On 3/13/2012 2:52 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Actually, not quite true, Your Mooseness. I have a number of visitors in my
>> gallery every year who set about discovering my equipment preferences right
>> off the bat. Of course they are shooters themselves (to what degree I don't
>> know), and they _never_ actually buy anything.<g>
>
> Ah! Then you need to come up with an answer just for them. Something
> far off the charts like an Alpa. Or maybe say a 20x24 banquet camera.
Point of order. Banquet cameras were semi panorama format, not nearly square.
Exactly for the purpose of capturing a
panorama of the people at banquets. This is from a contact print taken with
such a camera.
<http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Miscellaneous/Images&image=_MG_3214-17bii.jpg>
> Or say that these are stock photos from iStock which you just worked
> up into prints. One dollar for the image sure beats $15,000 in camera
> gear.
>
> Or say that these are actually Ansel Adams prints as you had conjoured
> him up in a dream one night.
I like!
Dining in Company Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
