| Subject: | Re: [OM] film scanners |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:05:00 -0700 |
On 6/19/2012 7:13 PM, Sawyer, Edward wrote: > On paper it looks better. Most of the shortcomings of existing scanners weren't visible "on paper". Withholding Judgment Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Silverfast HDR, Chris Barker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] (OM) Poppies, Moose |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] film scanners, Sawyer, Edward |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Miscellaneous Junk Mail, Jim Nichols |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |