If you want the ability to use on both systems, Paul, you will
be@making sacrifices - less choice of lenses, even fewer which will do
fast ('imager') AF on MFT.
Go native. I think several here@will extol the Panasonic 20/1.7
Piers
On 12/30/12, Paul Braun <pbraun42@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Once again, I turn to the wisdom of the group.
>
> Now that I've got the E-M5 and have decided to keep the E-1, and I'm getting
> the Panny FT-MFT adapter....
>
> As my 50th birthday was yesterday the CFO and I discussed a suitable present
> and I decided that a new lens would be a worthy gift, one that would allow
> me to create new art.
>
> I'm going to get a "normal" prime, something in the 20-30mm range.
>
> The question is, given the difference in AF systems, should I go for a full
> 4/3 lens that I can use on both or try to optimize the E-M5 and get a native
> MFT lens? I think the E-M5 is going to be my primary body from here on out.
>
>
> Also, I know Sigma has a good rep, but anyone here have experience using
> their MFT glass?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Paul Braun
> Certified Music Junkie
>
> "It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever." -- David St. Hubbins
>
> "Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life" - Harlan Howard
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|