Yes, that's much better. I can see some feather detail in the wings and
the downward curvature at the ends gives a greater sense of the wings
working on the glide even though they're not moving. It "explains" the
lack of apparent motion.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/27/2013 11:14 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 1/27/2013 5:45 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> The only problem I have with this shot is that the larger version is
>> still nowhere big enough. It looks to me as though there probably is
>> exquisite detail in this image... feathers, kelp, etc, etc. I want to
>> see it but can't. :-)
>
> Flatter me, and I'll do anything - well, what I can. :-)
>
> This happened so fast that I just moved my aim and pushed the button. By the
> time I zoomed out for a second shot, they
> were going out of sight. So - 140 mm on a 75-300 mm lens, which meant a fair
> crop. Here's the full frame.
> <http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=1803>
>
> Here's the same crop as before, but with the large version at 100%
> <http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=1799>
>
> Enough more detail for you? I hope so, 'cause that's all I got. ;-)
>
> Up Close Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|