I wasn't actually paying much attention to blown highlights (that came
from someone else) and I certainly didn't look at all of the images but
I'll take another look.
5567 - The sky is blown at the top of the image but is largely
recoverable even as a JPEG. There's more cloud detail there than what
shows on this image.
5569 - The sky is completely blown and is colorless and featureless. If
the image is important I'd recrop it to exclude the sky.
5627 - Not really blown but overly bright. Cutting the highlights back
reveals a bit more color and detail in the sky and clouds
5685 - As above
5686 - What 5685 should have been. Use this one instead. Why are both
here?
5698 - Not blown anywhere but I just happened to notice that I think
it's slightly underexposed and the snow is blue.
3592 - Mountains and sky overexposed and too blue. This one might be
hard to fix without applying separate corrections in layers. 3594 and
6040 have more of the same.
3849 - Draw the highlights down in the sky... still recoverable as a JPEG
I'm going to quit. I just realized that on some (maybe most) I've been
reading the image number from the image below the one I'm evaluating.
If the comment doesn't match check the one immediately above. I'm going
to get another cup of coffee.
Chuck Norcutt
On 7/4/2014 7:51 AM, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Can you by any
chance remember which of the pics had offensively blown highlights. From
memory I can think of just 5 candidates.
Brian
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|