Not ruffled, Mike, just interested in your interest :-)
The Westminster team has played it very badly – for many years. But that
doesn’t make it a good plan for Scotland to go it alone. I don’t want us to
lose Scotland, but I don’t believe that Scotland will have a good time of it:
it has a great deal to lose in practical terms and little to gain but in
emotional terms. I fully understand the inner urge to be Scottish, not
British, but that doesn’t mean that it’s a good idea for the wellbeing of the
country.
Chris
On 8 Sep 2014, at 19:26, Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Did not mean to ruffle feathers. I guess I didn't realize how emotional a
> subject this is even in England. Just to be clear. I don't have a dog in this
> fight, just making a comment as an interested bystander. The information was
> quoted from UK media but didn't seem to appear as a quote in my post. (??)
> The bs comment was to Westminister focusing on the uncertainties in an
> admittedly very nebulous proposition in order to support the NO vote rather
> than staying out of it. But then, when have they? Admittedly they do have a
> dog on the sidelines training for the possible next bout. But now it's up to
> the voters. ...
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|