The cut-off point is exactly where I placed it, of course!
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA
> On 19 Jun 2017, at 02:22, John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In the present two examples, where is the cut off point between "tighter is
> better" and not tight enough from which the conclusion, albeit subjectively,
> concludes that the less tight image is an "inferior" image?
>
> jh
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2017-06-18 8:37 PM, Moose wrote:
>> On 6/18/2017 11:09 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>>> I have followed Philippe’s suggestion, and the alternate image is here:
>>>
>>> http://www.greatpix.eu/All/Picture-A-Day/i-dBWR9P3/A
>>>
>>> Having looked at the two images side by side, I conclude that
>>> Philippe’s suggestion was right on the money.
>>
>> I agree. A case where tighter is better.
>>
>> AoV Moose
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|