Aah - because she's only familiar with watching me using LR - she's used
Nikon's ViewNX on her laptop so she has to switch anyway. And as I can
install LRCC on 2 machines it's an option...
Anyway it sounds as though she'll be happy with the LR raw conversion as I
hoped. I suppose we need Viewer3 for f/w updates?
Many thanks
Jez
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 at 06:18, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7/19/2017 9:00 AM, Jez Cunningham wrote:
> > OK, so I did it and ordered the camera and 2-lens kit for my wife. And
> the
> > JJC auto lens cap.
> >
> > It's back-ordered (with a rebate) so it probably won't arrive in time for
> > her birthday - too bad...
> >
> > But in anticipation I need to prepare her laptop.
> > As a regular person (i.e. not a pixel-peeping fusspot) if she does the
> raw
> > conversion in Lightroom instead of Viewer3 is it likely she'll notice any
> > difference?
>
> Not if she doesn't see V3, ba-da-bum. ;-)
>
> People who are hooked on Oly out of camera JPEGS tend to like V3. I
> personally prefer the default look of LR/ACR. If
> she's been happily using LR for her Nikon images, I imagine she will be
> happy with LR for Oly. Adobe strives for a
> consistent default Raw conversion look across brands and models.
>
> My first line is actually kinda serious. Why provide a choice, when a
> program that she's familiar with does a good job?
>
> Moose D'Opinion
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|