Re: [OM] IMG: A Different Mustang

Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: A Different Mustang
From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:45:50 -0900
> Certainly the over the weather thing is an advantage, but the King Air beats 
> it in fuel consumption and maintenance costs.
> But the Mustang beats the LKing Air in the make your d**k bigger contest, not 
> a small consideration in owner operated AC.

I'd pick the King Air every time because of field options. Shorter
runways, gravel runways. And cargo carrying options. Besides, the
problem with this bigger d**k thing is that you show up in your tiny
Mustang and you're going to get punted by the Gulfstream Gang.

I think half the world's supply of Cessnas are found up here in
Alaska, but precious few (if any) are Mustangs. The aeromed flights
are almost all King Airs and Learjets. The air-cargo small jets are
more often than not Learjets. Almost everybody with a private jet also
has two other private airplanes. A float plane and bush plane on
monster tires is standard fare. Instead of jets or King Airs, you're
more likely to see a Pilatus PC-12 as the d**k plane of choice. And
for good reason. It's the Goldilocks of airplanes. I take it back. The
ultimate d**k plane here is a Beaver.

AK Schnozz
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>