Hans;
Thanks for response. Yes, I was wondering about how it compares to the
65-200 and 85-250. I have both of those and was thinking of selling
them and getting the 50-250. But they're both quite good lenses IMO.
So good luck using yours and I hope it's as good as it's reputation.
George
Hans van Veluwen wrote:
>
> George wrote:
>
> :You've probably answered this before, but ... Other than the false
> :advertising for macro range, how do you like this lens. It's reputed to
> :be the best Zuiko zoom except for the 35-80/2.8 Do you have other zooms
> :so that you have a feel for how this one compares?
>
> I'm sorry, George, I have lots of zooms, but the only other Zuik zooms I
> have are the 35-70/3.5-4.5 and the 75-150/4. I think I don't even have to
> run some tests to proove that the 50-250 is better. You want a comparison
> with the 65-200 and the 85-250, of course. Maybe I should fly over to Las
> Vegas to have it tested... I "bet" mine wins :-)
> I can't even answer the question how I like it, because I own this lens only
> for a month or so, and there hasn't been a photo event where I needed it (I
> was thinking of using it for stuff like daylight open air concerts, where
> the slow speed doesn't matter). So it has been sitting on the shelf just as
> if it were a collectors item :-)
>
> Hans
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|