Delete the last forward slash, I'm sure mistakenly entered.
caesar2@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Ron & Mary Spolarich
www.mscollectibles.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Charles Loeven <cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] web site update
> ===I had a little more success scanning slides, though colour balance is
the
> new antichrist ;-) Seriously, the b&w negatives were an absolute cinch,
> while colour transparencies prove more tricky. All OM-sourced, of course:
> http://www.mawddwy.freeserve/.co.uk
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon E.====
>
> I can't get to your site either.
>
> Question, I was told that (color) negatives do not scan as well as trans.
> No reason given, just a confident statement by one of those *experts*
> at the local one hour lab. Is this true???
> Negatives do have more information than trans, no?
> I mean latitude, so there would be more shadow detail etc.
> if the exposure was equal to the transparency.
>
> Charlie L.
> forever confused about digital.
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|