On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Giles wrote:
> Then John does the whole thing again for square, pentagonal, hexagonal,
> septilateral, octagonal and round apertures.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
What's wrong with "heptagonal"? and in the interest of scientific rigour
we should try decagonal, dodecagonal and duodecagonal at least. IIRC
the 100/2.8 has 9 diaphragm blades so we can use that for the nonagonal
aperture.
--
________________________________________________________________________
* | |
| / | |/-\ | Ian A. Nichols |
| | | | | | |
| \-/| | / | i.a.nichols@xxxxxxxxxx |
| * iann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|