Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] a question

Subject: Re: [OM] a question
From: Jim Couch <spknsprkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 12:05:08 -0800
Understood. I wasn't sure myself, so decided to post the comments about the
OM-2/Om2n.

ClassicVW@xxxxxxx wrote:

> In a message dated 1/11/01 12:07:54 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> spknsprkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << Actually this is not true on an OM2 orOM2n.
> Not sure about the OM-10 though.
>   >>
> I was referring to an OM-10. At least i thought that's what Nicola had.
>
> George S.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz