ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!

Subject:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!
From:	DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx
Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2001 02:02:57 EDT

teh T32 goes with an OM2n, not an OM2..for the OM2 you need the older 318.(is 
that the number?? it's late!) 

Susan Steele
Virginia USA 
The best way to forget all your troubles is to wear tight shoes. 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Larry Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, John Hermanson Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Charles Loeven Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Jim Couch Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Henrik Dahl Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, c.e.packard Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy <= Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, andrew fildes Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Jim Couch Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, John Hermanson Re: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Bill Stanke Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, DaEyeGuy [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, jlamadoo, home account Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Larry Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, Garth Wood

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] [OT] Shoes - was: America: The good Neighbor, Ray Moth
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, andrew fildes
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, c.e.packard
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!, andrew fildes
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]