| Subject: | Re: RE: [OM] OT Cameras as cars |
|---|---|
| From: | siddiq <iddibhai@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:58:58 -0800 |
11/18/2002 10:20:44 AM, Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >You're forgetting that for an accurate analogy you must compare OM to a >car that reached its pinnacle about twenty years ago and is no longer in >production :>( 240Z. no question about it. /S -- "We apologise for the inconvenience." < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, siddiq |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: RE: [OM] OT Cameras as cars, Timpe, Jim |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] OT Cameras as cars, Winsor Crosby |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] OT Cameras as cars, Timpe, Jim |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |