Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OT photo ops

Subject: Re: [OM] OT photo ops
From: "Gareth.J.Martin" <g.j.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:49:00 +0100
Wasn't it that Dicky Branson was turned down because BA didn't want the competition using what is their trademark aircraft, and that fact that it would probably make Virgin a much stronger competitor than it already is (I've been told by many that Virgin Atlantic are excellent and BA aren't very good). You're right though. Its pathetic! I would have expected at least one of them to go to the Smithsonian Air and Space museum, and one should go back to its birthplace. B****y politicians!

All the best,
Gareth.

Jon Mitchell wrote:
<snip>
"Three of the five Concordes still flying are to be given permanent
retirement homes overseas under plans drawn up by British Airways.

"Two of the aircraft will be based in the United States, at the Intrepid Air
and Space Museum in New York and the Seattle Museum of Flight.

"Another will go to Barbados. It does not have an aviation museum, but a
local businessman plans to build one at the island's airport."
</snip>

What is annoying me more than anything else is the way this has been done. I
wasn't around when all the concordes started, but my understanding of it is
this :

When British Airways were given, yes that's GIVEN, the fleet of Concorde's
by the government (who paid for them), it was with the agreement that if
they were to stop the service then they MUST sell the fleet to any
interested party for the fee of 1GBP (yes ONE GBP !) for the purposes of
continuing the Concorde service.  Now granted, the person buying the fleet
would have some very large costs to keep the service going, but a certain
enterprising individual here did actually make the bid.  His reasoning being
that it would make good business sense, and keep a spectacular piece of
engineering in the air.

Why has this agreement between BA and the government been so swiftly swept
under the carpet and ignored ?  I don't know, but given the way things have
been going with our current leadership over the last few years - frankly it
doesn't surprise me.

I'm still hopeful that someone who wants to continue to run the service will
be given the opportunity.

Rant over.  Sorry.  I really must finish my web-page, then I can vent there
!! (There is a "rant-of-the-day" page in the making .... !).  Can I join the
curmudgeon club ? Please ?!!

Jon


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



--

Gareth.J.Martin

Research Postgraduate
School of Geographical Sciences
University of Bristol
University Road
Bristol
BS8 1SS

g.j.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
attackwarningred@xxxxxxxxxxx
eclipsing.binary@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


NE NLCOG - The amateur NLC observing group:
http://freespace.virgin.net/eclipsing.binary

Support Mozilla Firebird:
http://texturizer.net/firebird/


"The only way of discovering the limits of the possible
is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."

Arthur C. Clarke's Second Law.

"There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that flags do not
wave in a vacuum."

Arthur C. Clarke


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz