I was just thinking of it to reduce shadows, that sort of thing. I know its
not that powerful, but I was thinking it may be "good enough" for some
instances. After yours and Chuck's comments, and going back and looking at it
again,
I'm realizing that its not worthwhile.
He's just marketing it toward the digital camera market. I guess he, like a
lot of people, don't think there's a film camera market large enough to put the
effort in and mention all the film camera models like he's done with listing
all the digital brands and models. Like I said before, his style and "look" of
the auctions does strike me as a bit cheesy.
George S.
piers@xxxxxxxx writes:
For $50 it has about half the output of a T20, with a slave added. That
seems steep - is there something about the slave which is specific to
digitals? Why would a normal slave not work?
Piers
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|