I'll have to re-read that page; I had read it before and was intrigued
by the Epson. But for me, first reading is just that. Thanks.
Earl
Winsor Crosby wrote:
>I think it is expensive to do an accurate zooming viewfinder such as
>the Contax G2. You might like something like the Epson RD-1. It is
>expensive too.
>
>http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/epson-rd1.shtml
>
>
>
>Winsor
>Long Beach, California, USA
>On Feb 22, 2005, at 5:52 PM, Earl Dunbar wrote:
>
>
>
>>So why can't a true window, comparable to the window of a Leica or
>>other
>>high quality rangefinder, be made? Yes, I know there is zoom/field of
>>view to deal with, but it seems like it should be doable. Maybe
>>another
>>reason I would like a digital rangefinder with interchangeable lenses
>>and framing marks for various primes.
>>
>>Earl
>>
>>Winsor Crosby wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>><snip>
>>>I admit that an EVF is not pretty and lacks dynamic range. I have not
>>>experienced the slow refresh rate some people have complained about. I
>>>suppose the few I have used have been better ones. An EVF is no more
>>>artificial than a ground glass which does not really look like a
>>>window, a slide or a print either.
>>>
>>>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|