| Subject: | [OM] Re: Best guess for arrival of E-2/E-3 |
|---|---|
| From: | ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:12:43 -0400 |
I'd agree. This, of course, assumes the camera and lens meet specs. Don't get me started about current manufacturing tolerances. >:-o ScottGee1 On 7/21/05, AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > SNIP! > When I can't get a decent enlargement from a 5MP file I've got > to blame myself, not the camera. > > AG ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Best guess for arrival of E-2/E-3, AG Schnozz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] TOPE 1: new entry and TOPE 23 submission time..., Olaf Greve |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Best guess for arrival of E-2/E-3, AG Schnozz |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Best guess for arrival of E-2/E-3, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |