Thanks, Jim. I'll consider your suggestion too. ^^
---
Michael
Palm, Linux, Olympus, Mac user
在 21 Jan 2007 9:26 AM 時，Jim Couch 寫到：
> Michael,
>
> I would say that it is close when stopped down (f8 or so) but would
> still give the edge to the 85/2. While the 35-70 is still quite good
> wide open, the 85 at f4 has better edge/corner sharpness.
>
> Jim
>
> Michael Wong wrote:
>> Jim,
>> I have 35/2, 50/1.2, I think the quality of them are excellent. How's
>> the quality of image of 35-70/3.5-4.5? Is it as good as 85/2?
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Michael
>> Palm, Linux, Olympus, Mac user
>>
>>
>>
>> 在 20 Jan 2007 2:34 AM 時，Jim Couch 寫到：
>>
>>
>>> Actually, if Michael is looking for a lightweight lens for
>>> backpacking/hiking, and can live with a bit slower & shorter lens
>>> at the
>>> long end the 35-70 3.5-4.5 is a great alternative - fairly readily
>>> available, very lightweight, and has a close focusing mode. (Olympus
>>> optimistically calls it Macro.) The 35-80, while a fine lens, is
>>> a bit
>>> of a tank!
>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>> Walt Wayman wrote:
>>>
>>>> An alternative might be the 35-80/2.8, but the chances of getting
>>>> one of those is just about nill. I'm thinking about locking mine
>>>> up in the safe. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Walt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ==============================================
>>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> ==============================================
>>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|