Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ( DZ OM ) Value for money?

Subject: Re: [OM] ( DZ OM ) Value for money?
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:32:28 -0400
I pondered that sentence myself and wondered if "calculated MTF" might 
mean what I suggested... that the lens MTF is back calculated from the 
system MTF.

Chuck Norcutt

Moose wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> I had not read this before and you raise some interesting and perplexing 
>> questions.  I knew they were using DXO something and, since they show 
>> resolution in excess of the sensor resolution, I had assumed (bad) that they 
>> were measuring the lens independent of the sensor and also with the sensor 
>> since the tests clearly use a particular camera.  You are right... where 
>> does the lens resolution beyond the sensor Nyquist limit come from?
>>   
> 
> "Whenever the measured numbers exceed this value, this simply indicates 
> that the lens out-resolves the sensor at this point - the calculated MTF 
> values themselves become meaningless." Meaningless, but published.
> 
> BTW, I really don't mean to slag their lens tests. I think they are 
> valuable and useful. I suspect that the things they measure are probably 
> fairly useful analogs for the more subtle things, i.e. those that do 
> well mostly will do well in less tangible areas of performance.
> 
> Hard too, to fault them for not measuring the unmeasurable.  :-)     
> Given the paucity of useful tests of  lenses on FF sensors, I think they 
> are a great service. The side-by-side comparison feature is great. In a 
> short time, I can see just how the 50/1.8 I have compares to the 50/1.4 
> in the areas they measure. At f1.8, the faster lens fall below the 
> slower one, and performance at f1.4 is well below the standard of both 
> lenses from f2.0-11.
> 
> It looks too, like the f1.8 might theoretically be easier to focus 
> manually, as it is significantly sharper wide open than is the f1.4. 
> That doesn't factor in differences in MF focusing mechanisms. In any 
> case, I can see that upgrading would be about build quality, a tiny bit 
> of speed, AF speed/noise and bokeh, not sharpness, contrast and distortion.
> 
> Moose
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz