Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] In depth SUV scientific based analysis (was TotallyOT

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] In depth SUV scientific based analysis (was TotallyOT
From: Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 19:15:31 -0400
A direct quote from your e-book. See, I really did buy it. <g>

--Bob


On May 27, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote:

> Begging the question fallacy
> 
> Assuming the conclusion or part of the conclusion in the premises of an 
> argument. (Sometimes called circular reasoning.)
> 
> Examples:
> 
> “To cast abortion as a solely private moral question,…is to lose touch with 
> common sense: how human beings treat one another is practically the 
> definition of a public moral matter. Of course, there are many private 
> aspects of human relations, but the question whether one human being should 
> be allowed fatally to harm another is not one of them. Abortion is an 
> inescapably public matter.”
> 
> H.M. Alvaré
> 
> In this example, the conclusion that abortion is a public matter simply 
> restates an earlier premise. It is mere repetition rather than argument. The 
> argument can be restructured to reach the same point more legitimately.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz