Ah, the much more delicate is the winner. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/3/2011 4:01 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 6/2/2011 9:43 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> Thanks, Moose.
>>
>> I'll work on the DOF.
>>
>> It's a manual focus lens (KA 50/4 macro) and using it without a tripod is a
>> little tricky. I'll do better . . .
>
> Ah yes, I recall wandering about the garden holding OM body with 135/4.5 on
> bellows, hand held. I was trying out what
> could come out of freedom from the time and angle limitations of using a
> tripod. A fair number came out fine, but a
> tripod really is better for most such things.
>
> No need to work on DOF on my account. ;-) Do what pleases you.
>
> BTW, we have what appear to be the same irises in our front garden; wrapped
> up their show for the year a couple of weeks
> ago. I don't seem to have any pics of them up on the web just now. Oh, wait,
> there's one here.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Lenses/SIMA/>
>
> And some much more delicately coloured
> here.<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/MPhotos/Home/CAirises/pages/_MG_0037.htm>
>
> Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|