Joel, Joel, Joel. What have you done?
I suppose I wasn't clear enough. I wasn't just looking for a digital back
for the Zuikos, but a digital back for the OM bodies. But we'll see what
all the shouting is about with this OM-D. If it's just a Panasonic G3 in OM
styling, Olympus will be brutalized.
SWMBO has said that Canon will be the next purchase unless the Sony or
X-Pro1 prove particularily worthy. No hurry, regardless.
AG
On Saturday, January 21, 2012, Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012, at 09:49 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> The fact is, if a company came out with a digital back that worked with
>> my
>> OM bodies and was of satisfactory performance, I'd buy it without
>> hesitation. $3000 would be no problem.
>
> Ken,
> Maybe this is the right moment to tell you that this is what I did two
> weeks ago, but it's a Canaan 5D (a bit gnarlier than I had hoped for,
> but it works well) and cost quite a bit less than $3000. If I'd had
> your available cash, I'd have been tempted to drop it for the Mk II. ;)
>
> Joel ("O How the Mighty are Fallen") W.
>
> --
> http://www.fastmail.fm - Access all of your messages and folders
> wherever you are
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|