>
> The Croci were in very poor light. Here is a shot without
> the fill flash. Perhaps, after all, it is the better
> image, though highlights from the sun are blown in both of
> the images.
>
> Original, with fill flash:
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus85.jpg.html
>
> Without fill flash:
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus82.jpg.html
>
The second one, without the flash, is far better. The white petals are
more uniform in colour, though the foliage may be just slightly overexposed.
One of those occasions where flash does not help.
Speaking of flash, I picked up a Vivitar 283 flash with the manual, sync
cord, and padded case for just $5 at a thrift store. Did Vivitar have a
snap-on diffuser for that model?
>Comments and critiques welcomed.
>
>Jim Nichols
>Tullahoma, TN USA
>--
>_________________________________________________________________
>Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
