Re: [OM] Pluraling

[piers@xxxxxxxx]

I'm with Chris on all points he made.

A pedant would insist, of course, on 'Rolleiflices', but I would look
for any of numerous orifices up which to stuff that one. And the
singular is not orifex!

Piers

On 18/05/2013, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andrew, "stickler", please.  I am not worthy to be called "pedant".
>
> That looks fine to me, although if it's in a book you might use "Rolleiflex
> cameras" instead.
>
> Chris
>
> On 18 May 2013, at 06:32, Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hey Barker, Hemy and the rest of the pedantry squad.
>> What would you recommend as a plural for Rolleiflex?
>> I've been using Rolleiflexes but I'm expecting to be wrong.
>> Andrew Fildes
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/